Tommy Pham

User avatar
CaliforniaGoldSox
California - S#12 Champ
Posts: 9204
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:59 pm

Tommy Pham

Post by CaliforniaGoldSox »

Season 8: 100-62 (.617) TC LOSER
Season 12: 119-43 (.735) TC WINNER
Season 19: 99-63 (.611) TC LOSER
Season 21: 108-54 (.667) TC LOSER
User avatar
mckeeno
Hollywood - S#5 / 16 / 18 Champ
Posts: 8248
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:23 am
Location: Hollywood Stars

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by mckeeno »

5 @ 10.4
S5 - Temple Cup Winner
S16 - Temple Cup Winner
S18 - Temple Cup Winner
User avatar
vomass
Toronto - S#1 / 14 / 21 / 23 Champ
Posts: 5929
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by vomass »

2@15
Toronto Disguise

"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." - Winston Churchill
"... am I an addict? No. Have I tried it? Probably in one of my drunken stupors" - Rob Ford
User avatar
CaliforniaGoldSox
California - S#12 Champ
Posts: 9204
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:59 pm

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by CaliforniaGoldSox »

Anyone find the Cardinals punting on Pham extremely curious? I know they have OF depth but still...for that return on a pre-arb player?
Season 8: 100-62 (.617) TC LOSER
Season 12: 119-43 (.735) TC WINNER
Season 19: 99-63 (.611) TC LOSER
Season 21: 108-54 (.667) TC LOSER
User avatar
David Koresh
North Dallas
Posts: 4004
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:25 am
Location: Waco

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by David Koresh »

His career line is .271/.365/.463 (.828 OPS) and he looks a lot more like that player than the .306/.411/.520 (.931 OPS) he put up in 2017.
If a tie is like kissing your sister, losing is like kissing you grandmother with her teeth out. ~George Brett
User avatar
CaliforniaGoldSox
California - S#12 Champ
Posts: 9204
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:59 pm

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by CaliforniaGoldSox »

I'll take the over on his current stat line, looking at his batted ball data.
Season 8: 100-62 (.617) TC LOSER
Season 12: 119-43 (.735) TC WINNER
Season 19: 99-63 (.611) TC LOSER
Season 21: 108-54 (.667) TC LOSER
User avatar
vomass
Toronto - S#1 / 14 / 21 / 23 Champ
Posts: 5929
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by vomass »

David Koresh wrote:His career line is .271/.365/.463 (.828 OPS) and he looks a lot more like that player than the .306/.411/.520 (.931 OPS) he put up in 2017.
Right ... but isn't that a pretty good CFer? 800+ OPS CFers w/ OBP north of 350 don't grow on trees. I'd think this probably boils down to a numbers game, with Ozuna 3 years younger, Fowler really struggling and O'Neil crushing AAA they needed to make room some way. Clubhouse issues could be at play too, but I think this is more about opening up PT for Bader & O'Neil.
Toronto Disguise

"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." - Winston Churchill
"... am I an addict? No. Have I tried it? Probably in one of my drunken stupors" - Rob Ford
User avatar
vomass
Toronto - S#1 / 14 / 21 / 23 Champ
Posts: 5929
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by vomass »

Also, Pham goes to arbitration this winter. Given this year's results vs. the career number, the Cardinals are probably just not willing to pay what they think he'll ask for/get, which makes sense again given what they have to pay the other guys + having O'Neil and Bader around.
Toronto Disguise

"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." - Winston Churchill
"... am I an addict? No. Have I tried it? Probably in one of my drunken stupors" - Rob Ford
User avatar
Murph
Cleveland - S#13 / 17 Champ
Posts: 12022
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by Murph »

Would have been a perfect fit for the Indians. RH CF who’s shown he can hit and under control for a couple more years...for that return? Sign me up. Would much rather have Pham than Martin going forward (Martin is still an upgrade...granted most anything would have been an upgrade).
****** Sim 13 Temple Cup Champs ******
****** Sim 17 Temple Cup Champs ******
User avatar
rswanzey
Essex
Posts: 8061
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 9:57 am
Location: Monmouth, ME

Re: Tommy Pham

Post by rswanzey »

I drafted Pham with a 9th rounder. Kept him for a second year and then cut him after 2012. He was injury prone and it seemed unlikely he'd ever get a real shot. The Cards always have like nine OF candidates, it seems like.
Sim 17: 28-134
Sim 18: 97-65
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic